On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 1:15 PM, Paul Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 3 Nov 2008, Hamish wrote: >> MN: >>> >>> We can certainly freeze devel_grass6 and just tag RC1 >>> directly from that and test it rigorously. But are we >>> sure that nobody inserts new features? >> >> >> new Vect fns req'd for v.buffer2 should be merged ASAP then.
I have moved v.buffer2 over and don't observe any compile issues. Seems to be ok? > Was the issue with the linkm library ever resolved? No idea - any pointers? For new updated roadmap,see http://grass.osgeo.org/wiki/GRASS_6.4_Feature_Plan Markus _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
