On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 6:16 PM, Michael Barton <[email protected]> wrote: > Why do we have both r.mfilter and r.mfilter.fp? > I'm guessing that r.mfilter.fp works on floating point maps (or perhaps it > produces floating point maps?). A quick read did not explain the difference.
It looks like a clone to me (with the FP changes being the difference). Not sure if this still justifies the existence of r.mfilter. Markus _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
