On Dec 28, 2008, at 9:32 AM, Markus Neteler wrote:
On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 6:16 PM, Michael Barton <[email protected]
> wrote:
Why do we have both r.mfilter and r.mfilter.fp?
I'm guessing that r.mfilter.fp works on floating point maps (or
perhaps it
produces floating point maps?). A quick read did not explain the
difference.
It looks like a clone to me (with the FP changes being the
difference).
Not sure if this still justifies the existence of r.mfilter.
Markus
Or perhaps the current m.filter should be replaced by the code in
m.filter.fp?
Michael
_______________________________________________
grass-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
