Hi,

2010/1/19 Hamish <[email protected]>:
> Glynn wrote:
>> Maybe we should use the Python version from 7.0? Many users
>> will want Python anyhow, whereas Perl is only used for
>> g.html2man.
>
> At this point, my vote, AFA 6.4.0 goes, is to follow the path of
> least change. Which is to keep the existing perl script.

OK, anyway I would vote to replace Perl script in 6.5.

Martin

-- 
Martin Landa <landa.martin gmail.com> * http://gama.fsv.cvut.cz/~landa
_______________________________________________
grass-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev

Reply via email to