On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Martin Landa <[email protected]> wrote: > 2010/1/19 Hamish <[email protected]>: >> Glynn wrote: >>> Maybe we should use the Python version from 7.0? Many users >>> will want Python anyhow, whereas Perl is only used for >>> g.html2man. >> >> At this point, my vote, AFA 6.4.0 goes, is to follow the path of >> least change. Which is to keep the existing perl script. > > OK, anyway I would vote to replace Perl script in 6.5.
Agreed - we may then backport to 6.4.1 if possible and stable. Markus _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
