Hi,

2010/8/12 Markus Neteler <nete...@osgeo.org>:
>> So, there's no need to delay 6.4.0 for ctypes. We can add it in 6.4.1,
>> or even make a separate package which works with 6.4.0 (so long as we
>> don't change the API, we would just need to ensure that grass.py
>> contains the correct definition for GIS_H_VERSION so that G_gisinit()
>> works).

on the other hand what can cost to add ctypes now. One RC? That's
acceptable. I would suggest to add ctypes now, publish RC7 and in
one/two weeks final (before FOSS4G 2010). Stable will be released with
ctypes and without swig.

>> But if we release 6.4.0 with the swig directory in place, we'll still
>> be getting questions about it (that we probably won't be able to
>> answer) in ten years time.
>
> Given Glynn's suggestion I redraw my suggestion to add ctypes now.
> We'll do that for 6.4.1.
>
> Can anyone remove swig/ in the 6.4-release branch? I am also on the
> road these days with sporadic internet access. Then we can release
> 6.4.0 next week.

Done in r43095.

Martin

-- 
Martin Landa <landa.martin gmail.com> * http://gama.fsv.cvut.cz/~landa
_______________________________________________
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev

Reply via email to