On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 10:32 PM, Glynn Clements <[email protected]> wrote: > Hamish wrote: ... >> Similarly I am not against a 5.4.2 release if there >> is some terrible bug (ie data corruption or copyright issue) >> found which goes back there. > > 5.x is too old to be worth the trouble. I'm not sure that anyone would > still remember how to build, fix and package it. (e.g. the old gmake5 > build system).
I agree. Rarely, I backport very important stuff to 5 (1-2 a year) but I won't dive into the adventure to mess around with the Gmakefile system. Distros still delivering only GRASS 5 are just outdated. Markus _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
