FYI from proj-ML: see http://lists.maptools.org/pipermail/proj/2012-February/006123.html
>On 12-02-20 05:04 AM, Jeff McKenna wrote: >> On 12-02-09 3:40 PM, Smith, Michael ERDC-CRREL-NH wrote: >>> Frank, >>> >>> I would like to request a Proj release in the next couple of months. We >>> are going to be doing security testing of our Lidar system which makes >>> use of trunk proj for PDAL. I'd imagine that we will have a much easier >>> time having a released version. >>> >> >> Regular releases of Proj would also help package maintainers. > >Jeff / Mike, > >I have made a pass through the open PROJ.4 tickets and taken action on most >of the recent ones. I'm hoping to get some feedback on a couple of them. > >Two outstanding issues I'd like to address before a final release: > >1) Resolve whether it is appropriate for us to have switched from using >+datum= to a detailed definition in the EPSG init file. The GRASS folks >have raised cain (cane?) about this. Helmut ----- best regards Helmut -- View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.n6.nabble.com/Proj-Proj-Release-switched-from-using-datum-to-a-detailed-definition-in-the-EPSG-init-file-tp4492577p4492577.html Sent from the Grass - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
