Please see: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gis.proj-4.devel/5581
of thread at: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gis.proj-4.devel/5569 which suggests that Frank will revert the innovation until it has been discussed thoroughly. Roger Markus Neteler wrote > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 7:50 PM, Helmut Kudrnovsky <hellik@> wrote: >> FYI from proj-ML: >> >> see >> http://lists.maptools.org/pipermail/proj/2012-February/006123.html >> >> FrankW: >>>1) Resolve whether it is appropriate for us to have switched from using >>>+datum= to a detailed definition in the EPSG init file. > > To me that's not entirely clear: does Frank plan to solve the problem? > > Markus > _______________________________________________ > grass-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev > -- View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.n6.nabble.com/Proj-Proj-Release-switched-from-using-datum-to-a-detailed-definition-in-the-EPSG-init-file-tp4492577p4495707.html Sent from the Grass - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
