+1 for separator. Yes, I'm still here. ;-)
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 10:09:40AM +0200, Markus Neteler wrote: > Hi, > > me and some of my course participants (GeoSTAT 2012) stumbled over > the change of sep= to fs= in GRASS 7. > > While ... > > On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Hamish <[email protected]> wrote: > > Huidae Cho <wrote: > >> When I first wrote the original script, I also thought about fs=. But, > >> you're right, there are no fields to separate, and that's why it's been > >> separator=. > > > > ok, reverted. > > > > Hamish > > it has become again fs=... > http://grass.osgeo.org/grass70/manuals/html70_user/g.mlist.html > > In a quick poll in my course the people (being R savvy) all voted for > separator=, also to keep consistency with R! (and GRASS 6 btw). > > I would strongly suggest to change all fs= in GRASS 7 (several modules) > to separator= before it propagates more. > > Bonus: no script breakage from GRASS 6 to 7. > > Markus > _______________________________________________ > grass-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
