On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Huidae Cho <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 for separator.
+1 Markus M > > Yes, I'm still here. ;-) > > On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 10:09:40AM +0200, Markus Neteler wrote: >> Hi, >> >> me and some of my course participants (GeoSTAT 2012) stumbled over >> the change of sep= to fs= in GRASS 7. >> >> While ... >> >> On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Hamish <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Huidae Cho <wrote: >> >> When I first wrote the original script, I also thought about fs=. But, >> >> you're right, there are no fields to separate, and that's why it's been >> >> separator=. >> > >> > ok, reverted. >> > >> > Hamish >> >> it has become again fs=... >> http://grass.osgeo.org/grass70/manuals/html70_user/g.mlist.html >> >> In a quick poll in my course the people (being R savvy) all voted for >> separator=, also to keep consistency with R! (and GRASS 6 btw). >> >> I would strongly suggest to change all fs= in GRASS 7 (several modules) >> to separator= before it propagates more. >> >> Bonus: no script breakage from GRASS 6 to 7. >> >> Markus >> _______________________________________________ >> grass-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev > _______________________________________________ > grass-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
