As old NVIZ is set to go anyway, I'd say Yes for removing it from trunk. There is still time till 7.0 release to improve wxnviz to match all features/stability of good old NVIZ.
Maris. 2012/10/27 Anna Kratochvílová <[email protected]>: > On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 12:13 AM, Martin Landa <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> nviz is the last Tcl/Tk application in trunk. >> >> wxNviz [1] covers almost 100% of functionality compared to original >> nviz and it's stable enough for other testing and development. This is >> the main reason why I would vote for removing nviz from trunk >> including related libraries like `form` or `gtcltk`. > > Hi, > > here [1] is the comparison of tcltk nviz and wxNviz functionality, > feel free to edit it. > > Anna > > [1] > http://grass.osgeo.org/wiki/WxNviz#Comparison_of_Tcl.2FTk_nviz_and_wxNviz_functionality > >> >> Martin >> >> [1] http://grass.osgeo.org/wiki/WxNviz >> >> -- >> Martin Landa <landa.martin gmail.com> * http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/~landa >> _______________________________________________ >> grass-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev > _______________________________________________ > grass-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
