On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 8:34 AM, Paulo van Breugel <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks pointing it out. I have actually used the script some time ago. I > think I found that it becomes a bit slow when working with large number of > points, but I am going to try in grass 7, see if it is any faster due to > faster vector handling. > In theory, r.random should work for irregular areas if you set a MASK.
Markus M > Cheers, > > Paulo > > > On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 2:44 AM, GRASS GIS <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> #1874: latitudinal bias in sample points created with r.random >> >> ------------------------+--------------------------------------------------- >> Reporter: pvanbosgeo | Owner: grass-dev@… >> Type: defect | Status: new >> Priority: major | Milestone: 7.0.0 >> Component: Raster | Version: svn-trunk >> Keywords: r.random | Platform: Linux >> Cpu: x86-64 | >> >> ------------------------+--------------------------------------------------- >> >> Comment(by hamish): >> >> > It's internal >> >> (a friend was terrible with apostrophes and to/too/two & after too many >> emails it begins to look natural and the bad habit has rubbed off on me! >> argh!) >> >> -- >> Ticket URL: <https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/1874#comment:6> >> GRASS GIS <http://grass.osgeo.org> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > grass-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
