On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 9:21 PM, Markus Metz <[email protected]> wrote: > Glynn Clements wrote: ... >> If so, I suggest changing that, however invasive it may be. > > Very invasive. > >> I'd >> certainly suggest holding off on any 7.0 release until that's >> resolved. > > Hmm. This sounds like synchronizing some basic concepts of the raster > and vector libraries, which in turn sounds like something for GRASS 8.
IMHO yes. > GRASS 7 is IMHO in pretty good shape right now, lots of new features, > faster, global LFS, etc. And GRASS 7 is not new, it is actually many > years old. Therefore I would rather like to see get 7 released soon > and synchronize raster and vector libs in GRASS 8. +1 > For example, > something I am really missing in GRASS raster data is the history of > GRASS vector data. Also some more raster metadata like number of > non-null cells, mean and stddev (see GDAL) would be really helpful. > Not to mention the organization of raster file storage: have one > raster folder like for vector. Just for fun: ideas may be collected in this new trac page: http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/Grass8Planning :-) markusN _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
