> Hmm. This sounds like synchronizing some basic concepts of the raster > and vector libraries, which in turn sounds like something for GRASS 8. > GRASS 7 is IMHO in pretty good shape right now, lots of new features, > faster, global LFS, etc. And GRASS 7 is not new, it is actually many > years old. Therefore I would rather like to see get 7 released soon > and synchronize raster and vector libs in GRASS 8. For example, > something I am really missing in GRASS raster data is the history of > GRASS vector data. Also some more raster metadata like number of > non-null cells, mean and stddev (see GDAL) would be really helpful. > Not to mention the organization of raster file storage: have one > raster folder like for vector.
completely agreed. Martin -- Martin Landa * http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
