On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Huidae Cho <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > > IMO, printing fully-qualified names by default can be too much information > in terminal and make it uncomfortable to read map names only. Currently, it > prints fully-qualified names whenever maps cannot be identified by their > unqualified names (e.g., two maps with the same name in multiple mapsets). > Maybe there was a discussion already about this, but another option is to use -p as default (so that we actually see the mapsets) and add new flag -g as shell script style? So that the default would be the same as g.list before? If I should decide between with/without mapset (the original question), I think by default the mapset should be printed. The mapset information is more important for me than the clutter it causes. Anna > Huidae > > On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 5:47 AM, Luca Delucchi <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> On 28 October 2014 10:44, Martin Landa <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> >> Hi >> >> > 2014-10-27 21:01 GMT+01:00 Martin Landa <[email protected]>: >> >> I would suggest to print fully-qualified names by default. Any >> opinion? Martin >> > >> > If you agree I would vote for reverting logic of -m flag to >> > >> > Print unqualified map names (without mapsets) >> > >> > ? >> > >> >> +1 >> >> > Martin >> > >> >> >> -- >> ciao >> Luca >> >> http://gis.cri.fmach.it/delucchi/ >> www.lucadelu.org >> _______________________________________________ >> grass-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev >> > > > _______________________________________________ > grass-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev >
_______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
