-p as default is only good for the command line because in python scripts, you need more typing. The previous discussion was about making this module as friendly as possible both in the command line and scripting environments.
Reverting -m flag is fine with me unless anyone has strong arguments against it. On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 3:48 PM, Anna Petrášová <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Huidae Cho <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> IMO, printing fully-qualified names by default can be too much >> information in terminal and make it uncomfortable to read map names only. >> Currently, it prints fully-qualified names whenever maps cannot be >> identified by their unqualified names (e.g., two maps with the same name in >> multiple mapsets). >> > > Maybe there was a discussion already about this, but another option is to > use -p as default (so that we actually see the mapsets) and add new flag > -g as shell script style? So that the default would be the same as g.list > before? > > If I should decide between with/without mapset (the original question), I > think by default the mapset should be printed. The mapset information is > more important for me than the clutter it causes. > > Anna > > >> Huidae >> >> On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 5:47 AM, Luca Delucchi <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> On 28 October 2014 10:44, Martin Landa <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > Hi, >>> > >>> >>> Hi >>> >>> > 2014-10-27 21:01 GMT+01:00 Martin Landa <[email protected]>: >>> >> I would suggest to print fully-qualified names by default. Any >>> opinion? Martin >>> > >>> > If you agree I would vote for reverting logic of -m flag to >>> > >>> > Print unqualified map names (without mapsets) >>> > >>> > ? >>> > >>> >>> +1 >>> >>> > Martin >>> > >>> >>> >>> -- >>> ciao >>> Luca >>> >>> http://gis.cri.fmach.it/delucchi/ >>> www.lucadelu.org >>> _______________________________________________ >>> grass-dev mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> grass-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev >> > >
_______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
