Hi,

2015-02-13 18:09 GMT+01:00 Sebastiaan Couwenberg <[email protected]>:

> To reduce the diff with upstream I opted to drop the check4dev patch and
> rely on your check instead.

thanks.

> Any thoughts about the pager patch? I think it could be merged upstream
> too, but it's as a bit distribution specific.

probably yes, see "patches from http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/
(makefile/ctypes)" thread.

Martin

-- 
Martin Landa
http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa
http://gismentors.eu/mentors/landa
_______________________________________________
grass-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev

Reply via email to