Hi, 2015-02-13 18:18 GMT+01:00 Sebastiaan Couwenberg <[email protected]>: > The choice between separate source packages or not was also discussed on > the Debian GIS list, see the thread starting at: > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-gis/2015/01/msg00004.html > > I think it makes sense for GRASS upstream to use separate source > packages to allow co-installation, but this makes less sense for the > official Debian package.
OK, thanks for explanation (btw, I have subscribed myself to this ML). > We mostly need to consider the versions for the different package > lineages to allow co-existence of the different package sources. So do you suggest to apply [1,2] to GRASS source code (trunk and relbr70)? Martin [1] http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-grass/grass.git/tree/debian/patches/appstream.patch?h=experimental [2] http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-grass/grass.git/tree/debian/patches/desktop.patch?h=experimental -- Martin Landa http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa http://gismentors.eu/mentors/landa _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
