Hi, On 02/13/2015 06:34 PM, Martin Landa wrote: > 2015-02-13 18:18 GMT+01:00 Sebastiaan Couwenberg <[email protected]>: >> The choice between separate source packages or not was also discussed on >> the Debian GIS list, see the thread starting at: >> >> https://lists.debian.org/debian-gis/2015/01/msg00004.html >> >> I think it makes sense for GRASS upstream to use separate source >> packages to allow co-installation, but this makes less sense for the >> official Debian package. > > OK, thanks for explanation (btw, I have subscribed myself to this ML).
In the mean time I had also subscribed to grass-dev@ :) >> We mostly need to consider the versions for the different package >> lineages to allow co-existence of the different package sources. > > So do you suggest to apply [1,2] to GRASS source code (trunk and relbr70)? The appstream.patch is distribution specific, so I don't think you need to merge it in GRASS upstream. The Keywords from the desktop.patch should be merged upstream, but the Exec & Icon changes are distribution specific. Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/E88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1 _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
