On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 8:09 AM, Martin Landa <[email protected]> wrote:
> 2015-02-21 14:01 GMT+01:00 Yann Chemin <[email protected]>: > > Regardless of all the rest, I like the idea of moving grass70 -> grass > and grass -> grass6, I feel it kinda makes a statement here, beyond the > actual release, it is just the new state of the software. > > > > But then that means simply +1 for option b) > > well, b) is probably too much radical from user POV. Moreover in the > most of Linux distributions the name of GRASS 7 package will be > probably `grass7` and not `grass`. > I have the feeling that Ubuntu/Debian has always names like "grass7", as you decided in another thread, and then there is a metapackage named like "grass" which depends on "grass7", or sometimes on the "expected set of packages" such as "grass7-core", "grass7-gui", "grass7-doc".
_______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
