On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 9:46 AM, Martin Landa <[email protected]> wrote:
> 2015-02-21 15:44 GMT+01:00 Vaclav Petras <[email protected]>: > > I have the feeling that Ubuntu/Debian has always names like "grass7", as > you > > decided in another thread, and then there is a metapackage named like > > "grass" which depends on "grass7", or sometimes on the "expected set of > > packages" such as "grass7-core", "grass7-gui", "grass7-doc". > > it doesn't seems to be like that, see clarification [1]. Martin > > [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-gis/2015/02/msg00048.html Hm, I don't understand it. However, compatibility with Linux packaging conventions would be nice in OSGeo4W. Compatibility with other projects in OSGeo4W would make sense too. I guess that grass has most complex situation but is there any general practice?
_______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
