On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 8:10 AM, Nikos Alexandris <[email protected]> wrote:
> I have another use-case, hence another update to the script. Does > anyone care to have a look at the proposed diff (really a quick hack, no > extensive testing done but it works for me). > Looks good except for computing the slope and aspect on the fly. r.slope.aspect runs twice once for slope, once for aspect. With current code, it actually looks that there might be some override issues. Try harder to preserve current mechanism where one r.slope.aspect call is build according to missing inputs. You need to change the if conditions somehow. (Only reading the diff.)
_______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
