* Vaclav Petras <[email protected]> [2015-05-15 08:41:17 -0400]: > On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 8:10 AM, Nikos Alexandris <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > I have another use-case, hence another update to the script. Does > > anyone care to have a look at the proposed diff (really a quick hack, no > > extensive testing done but it works for me). > > > > Looks good except for computing the slope and aspect on the fly. > r.slope.aspect runs twice once for slope, once for aspect. With current > code, it actually looks that there might be some override issues. Try > harder to preserve current mechanism where one r.slope.aspect call is build > according to missing inputs. You need to change the if conditions somehow. > (Only reading the diff.)
Known issue, thanks for reading Vaclav. Will rework another day on it. Nikos _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
