On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Vaclav Petras <wenzesl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 9:47 AM, Pietro <peter.z...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Martin Landa <landa.mar...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > 2015-05-13 8:03 GMT+02:00 Pietro <peter.z...@gmail.com>: > > > > > >> As you can see the description of the parameter add the default > > >> description set in G_OPT_V_INPUT and in a new line the description > > >> added manually in the definition of the module parameters. Instead the > > >> G_OPT_R_INPUT shows only the description set manually. > > > > > > right, G_OPT_V_INPUT has defined both label and description [1]. This > > > the source of inconsistency. There are more standard options which > > > defines both label and description. > > > > Do you think this inconsistency should be fix, or just reported > > somewhere on a Wiki page? > > Perhaps all standard options should define both label and description and you can then modify whatever suits you. (I often end up setting both.) > > In the future, we should revise this anyway, like move from description to label as the primary one or making both mandatory.
See also *Standard options label vs description* from Huidae Cho: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/2014-June/069313.html http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Standard-options-label-vs-description-td5144023.html Vaclav
_______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
