I think we still need to fix it. On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Vaclav Petras <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Vaclav Petras <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 9:47 AM, Pietro <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Martin Landa <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > 2015-05-13 8:03 GMT+02:00 Pietro <[email protected]>: > > > > > > > >> As you can see the description of the parameter add the default > > > >> description set in G_OPT_V_INPUT and in a new line the description > > > >> added manually in the definition of the module parameters. Instead > the > > > >> G_OPT_R_INPUT shows only the description set manually. > > > > > > > > right, G_OPT_V_INPUT has defined both label and description [1]. This > > > > the source of inconsistency. There are more standard options which > > > > defines both label and description. > > > > > > Do you think this inconsistency should be fix, or just reported > > > somewhere on a Wiki page? > > > > Perhaps all standard options should define both label and description > and you can then modify whatever suits you. (I often end up setting both.) > > > > In the future, we should revise this anyway, like move from description > to label as the primary one or making both mandatory. > > See also *Standard options label vs description* from Huidae Cho: > > http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/2014-June/069313.html > > http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Standard-options-label-vs-description-td5144023.html > > Vaclav > > > _______________________________________________ > grass-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev >
_______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
