This definitely needs a flag + explanation in documentation. Taking into account philosophy behind GRASS raster processing, I would say - default should be to apply MASK, as MASK affects all raster reading operations (unless stated otherwise or requested by user).
Maris. 2015-10-06 19:15 GMT+03:00 Martin Landa <[email protected]>: > 2015-10-06 18:13 GMT+02:00 Moritz Lennert <[email protected]>: >> But this was a bug that you fixed in r66421, or ? > > yes, it was. I was just wondering why the module should ignore the > mask. It was answered. Martin > > -- > Martin Landa > http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa > http://gismentors.cz/mentors/landa > _______________________________________________ > grass-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
