I think r66421 should be backported and as for the mask, the related code can be removed in my opinion.
Anna On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 4:40 AM, Markus Neteler <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 3:27 PM, Anna Petrášová <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > sorry I jumped so late into this discussion, but I think we can just > remove > > any mask related code in v.rast.stats - it's apparently leftover from > > https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/changeset/44444/ > > > > It used mask in the past, but now it uses r.univar zones instead. > > This is still open, right? > > Markus >
_______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
