Dear Jaro and all, During recent code sprint in Boston I ported r.sim.water.mp to GRASS r.sim.water and r.sim.sediment. I tested it with r.sim.sediment and it seems to work, so let me know if there are any reasons parallelization shouldn't be used with r.sim.sediment. I removed all the commented parts which you probably put there during experimenting. I didn't remove the version in addons, because you have it linked in your paper, but maybe we should put a note in the r.sim.water.mp manual, that the latest version is in the core? As for r.sun, when I have time, I will look at it.
Anna On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 4:24 AM, Jaro Hofierka <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Markus, > > This is just a small contribution and I would like acknowledge help of > reviewers to improve the manuscript. I believe more such grass-based papers > in scientific journals will further promote GRASS within the wider > scientific community. > Of course, we would welcome if this could go to the trunk version. Vaclav > helped us is v.surf.rst and it is already there and I hope he could also > help with r.sim.water and r.sun. He can contact me or my colleagues and we > will provide any assistance. > > Best wishes, > > Jaro > > Markus Neteler napísal(a): > >> Hi, >> >> just saw that this article got published (congrats, Jaro and team): >> >> Hofierka, J., Lacko, M., Zubal, S., 2017. Parallelization of >> interpolation, solar radiation and water flow simulation modules in >> GRASS GIS using OpenMP. Computers & Geosciences. >> doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2017.07.007 >> >> Questions: since the code is already in addons, how about merging the >> changes into trunk? >> >> Markus >> > _______________________________________________ > grass-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
