Yeah, that acquisition is bad news. Why can we just not use the OSGeo one? Just curious.
Huidae On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 5:00 PM, Markus Neteler <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 10:50 PM, Martin Landa <[email protected]> > wrote: > [...] > > Migration to *git* is planned in any > > case :-) A host platform is not decided yet. > > We simply need to decide between own hosting (incl. git repo by OSGeo) > and effectively commercial providers (github, gitlab, bitbucket, ...). > > As long as we do not depend on highly specific features of such a > platform, migration to another git based platform will remain "easy". > > We should carefully try to identify potential single points of failure > like service unstable, unmaintained in the long run, pay-only traps > and the like. But unless we use the standard features of git along > with maybe CI we are relatively flexible in choosing the platform. > > Just my 0.02 cents, > Markus > _______________________________________________ > grass-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev > -- Huidae Cho, Ph.D., PE, M.ASCE, CFM, GISP Adjunct Faculty, Kennesaw State University Senior Geospatial Engineer, MapAnything Open Source GIS Developer, GRASS GIS Development Team
_______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
