On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 7:16 PM, Luca Delucchi <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 13 June 2018 at 22:07, Markus Neteler <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > As I said: the OSGeo git services are IMHO under-staffed and would > > require a dedicated budget. Could be a nice idea but the board needs > > to support that. > > > > I don't think so, git on OSGeo server is working [0], and the board > also use it [1]. I don't see any problem, it is like trac or svn.... > I also used it for an OSGeo code [2] > I agree. Also remember that git is a distributed repository, so individual developers would have their own "complete" repository. I assume less maintenance compared to SVN. Huidae > > Markus > > > > PS > Probably I will move most of my github repositories to OSGeo one and > gitlab according the code topic > > [0] https://git.osgeo.org/gitea/ > [1] https://git.osgeo.org/gitea/osgeo/todo/issues > [2] https://git.osgeo.org/gitea/lucadelu/gci_analyst > > -- > ciao > Luca > > www.lucadelu.org > _______________________________________________ > grass-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev > -- Huidae Cho, Ph.D., PE, M.ASCE, CFM, GISP Senior Geospatial Engineer, MapAnything Open Source GIS Developer, GRASS GIS Development Team
_______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
