On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 7:29 AM Maris Nartiss <[email protected]> wrote: > ceturtd., 2019. g. 11. apr., plkst. 23:46 — lietotājs Markus Neteler > (<[email protected]>) rakstīja: > > On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 8:42 AM Martin Landa <[email protected]> wrote: > > > 7.7 -> develpment > > > 7.6 -> stable > > > 7.4 -> maintenance > > > What do you think? > > I think we should stop adding LTS to releases unless we plan to > support them for several years (~one full Debian/Ubuntu LTS cycle).
Well, a few remarks: - we do support older releases for several years (for sure not forever, though), see https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/browser/grass/branches?order=date&desc=1 - The LTS indications should be extended with a year at https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/roadmap - Backporting is a team effort :-) > One year a go we released 7.2.3 and labelled it as a LTS. > I am fine with Martin's proposal as long as we are clear what we mean with > LTS. From my side: we put an EOL year to each LTS, like other projects also do. The important part is however, to eventually release the code (which is always a lot of work, like many hours...). Markus _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
