* Markus Neteler <[email protected]> [2019-04-27 19:22:09 +0200]:
On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 7:29 AM Maris Nartiss <[email protected]> wrote:
ceturtd., 2019. g. 11. apr., plkst. 23:46 — lietotājs Markus Neteler
(<[email protected]>) rakstīja:
> On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 8:42 AM Martin Landa <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 7.7 -> develpment
> > 7.6 -> stable
> > 7.4 -> maintenance
> > What do you think?
I think we should stop adding LTS to releases unless we plan to
support them for several years (~one full Debian/Ubuntu LTS cycle).
Well, a few remarks:
- we do support older releases for several years (for sure not
forever, though), see
https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/browser/grass/branches?order=date&desc=1
- The LTS indications should be extended with a year at
https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/roadmap
- Backporting is a team effort :-)
One year a go we released 7.2.3 and labelled it as a LTS.
I am fine with Martin's proposal as long as we are clear what we mean with LTS.
From my side: we put an EOL year to each LTS, like other projects also do.
The important part is however, to eventually release the code (which
is always a lot of work, like many hours...).
Markus and all,
out of interest: what is the closest development and distribution
model, of other open source projects, that "matches" the one of GRASS
GIS?
Thank you, Nikos
_______________________________________________
grass-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
