Markus, > On 28 Jul 2024, at 11:54, Markus Neteler via grass-dev > <grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org> wrote: > > Hi devs, > > I just discovered that the tarball no longer contains the version in > the tarball "grass" subdir (expected "grass-8.4.0"): > > tar tvfz ~/grass-8.4.0.tar.gz | head > drwxr-xr-x runner/docker 0 2024-07-27 15:34 grass/ > -rwxr-xr-x runner/docker 458838 2024-07-27 15:32 grass/configure > -rw-r--r-- runner/docker 778 2024-07-27 15:32 grass/pyproject.toml > -rw-r--r-- runner/docker 4067 2024-07-27 15:32 grass/CITATION.cff > -rw-r--r-- runner/docker 436 2024-07-27 15:32 grass/.dockerignore > -rw-r--r-- runner/docker 3272 2024-07-27 15:32 grass/Vagrantfile > -rw-r--r-- runner/docker 1488 2024-07-27 15:32 grass/TODO > drwxr-xr-x runner/docker 0 2024-07-27 15:32 grass/display/ > drwxr-xr-x runner/docker 0 2024-07-27 15:32 grass/display/d.rhumbline/ > -rw-r--r-- runner/docker 53 2024-07-27 15:32 > grass/display/d.rhumbline/local_proto.h > > Why is that? Is it a feature? > It breaks e.g. the (Fedora) RPM packaging procedure... >
It is unfortunately not a feature, but a regression by PR 3437 [1]. Too bad that one slipped. Breaks current procedure for MacPorts too, but is patchable. Is a fix urgent or is a quick 8.4.1 release necessary? Nicklas [1] https://github.com/OSGeo/grass/pull/3437
_______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
