Madi’s suggestion makes sense to me.  I suppose that the wording of #2 could be 
modified to allow for the case where all members have already voted with no 
dissenting comments, if we think a rush situation might come up.  I.e. instead 
of just increasing 4 days to 7 days, it could be worded as a default 7 days if 
comments are still being exchanged and votes coming in, but less time if 
everyone has voted without issue.

On Apr 6, 2014, at 07:48 , Margherita Di Leo <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> 
> On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 12:48 PM, Markus Neteler <[email protected]> wrote:
> PSC;
> 
> since the voting discussion is scattered around in various email
> threads, I start a new one to separate it from ongoing motions. Please
> re-express your comments as answer to this email.
> 
>   RFC3: PSC Voting Procedures
>   http://grass.osgeo.org/programming7/rfc3_psc.html
> 
> I fully support this proposal. My only concern raises about "business day" 
> definition. PSC members are from all over the world and it might happen to be 
> public holidays in some countries and working days in some else. I'd propose 
> to change this sentence:
> 
> "Proposals are available for review for at least four business days" 
> 
> into:
> 
> "Proposals are available for review for at least seven days"
> 
> Would this be OK?
> 
> Thanks,
> Madi
> 
> -- 
> Best regards,
> 
> Dr. Margherita DI LEO    
> Scientific / technical project officer
> 
> European Commission - DG JRC 
> Institute for Environment and Sustainability (IES)
> Via Fermi, 2749
> I-21027 Ispra (VA) - Italy - TP 261
>        
> Tel. +39 0332 78 3600   
> [email protected]
> 
> Disclaimer: The views expressed are purely those of the writer and may not in 
> any circumstance be regarded as stating an official position of the European 
> Commission.
> _______________________________________________
> grass-psc mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc

_______________________________________________
grass-psc mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc

Reply via email to