I agree with the voting rules with the following changes/comments: - change 4 business days to seven days to avoid confusion given that business days may be different in different countries due to holidays (as already suggested) - I am confused about #6 - does this mean that it is enough for 2 PSC members (out of 10?) to agree to accept a proposal? Should we have at least a simple majority? Does this voting procedure apply to svn access as well?
Helena Helena Mitasova Associate Professor Department of Marine, Earth, and Atmospheric Sciences 2800 Faucette Drive, Rm. 1125 Jordan Hall North Carolina State University Raleigh, NC 27695-8208 hmit...@ncsu.edu "All electronic mail messages in connection with State business which are sent to or received by this account are subject to the NC Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.” On Apr 6, 2014, at 6:48 AM, Markus Neteler wrote: > PSC; > > since the voting discussion is scattered around in various email > threads, I start a new one to separate it from ongoing motions. Please > re-express your comments as answer to this email. > > RFC3: PSC Voting Procedures > http://grass.osgeo.org/programming7/rfc3_psc.html > > > Issues: > - people are travelling and periodically offline > - not all members may need to vote (majority, quorum, etc) > - keep it simple > - ... > > Best, > Markus > _______________________________________________ > grass-psc mailing list > grass-psc@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc _______________________________________________ grass-psc mailing list grass-psc@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc
