+1 I also think we should stop GRASS 6 development
On 6 April 2014 19:01, Martin Landa <[email protected]> wrote: > 2014-04-06 15:16 GMT+02:00 Moritz Lennert <[email protected]>: > > > Hamish, maybe you could be the official grass6 maintainer, managing the > > whole grass6 development in the way you propose, i.e. any new development > > and bugfixes first go into grass6dev for a period of testing, before > _you_ > > make the decision that something can be backported to grass6release. I do > > think however, that for this to work, we would need to regularly publish > > snapshots of grass6dev for easy testing. > > I think we should really stop thinking about GRASS 6 "development", > ideally we should fully focus our energy on GRASS 7. We do not have > enough man-power for keeping development in GRASS 6, simply saying. So > please bug fix only should go there (relbr64). No new functionality. > > Martin > > -- > Martin Landa * http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa > _______________________________________________ > grass-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev > -- ----
_______________________________________________ grass-psc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc
