Hi, On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 12:19 AM, Helena Mitasova <hmit...@ncsu.edu> wrote:
> I believe that we have a communication problem here rather than a > disagreement about the GRASS6.5: > > Hamish says: > "GRASS 6.x is already far along into bugfix maintenance mode. > *Please, just leave it to naturally and quietly make its way into history.* > I wish to use the bulk of my grass dev time maintaining the grass 6 line. > To do that properly I need a staging area, and devbr6 is it. " > > which is pretty much in agreement with Martin's: > "I think we should really stop thinking about GRASS 6 "development", > So please bug fix only should go there (relbr64). No new functionality." > > So I think that we have a broad agreement on maintenance only mode for > grass6 line, > and if there is a concern that new features will be added to grass6.5, > perhaps we can keep it > in read-only mode as suggested in one of the initial emails in this > discussion and have > only Hamish keep write access for testing ("staging area"). > > I think that if Hamish can maintain GRASS6 line this will free the time > for all other developers to focus on GRASS7. > Regarding GRASS7 - it is in a pretty good shape, we have been using it in > classes since the fall semester > and I was quite surprised how little changes are needed to update the full > semester course material for GRASS7. > This makes sense to me. Thanks, Madi -- Best regards, Dr. Margherita DI LEO Scientific / technical project officer European Commission - DG JRC Institute for Environment and Sustainability (IES) Via Fermi, 2749 I-21027 Ispra (VA) - Italy - TP 261 Tel. +39 0332 78 3600 margherita.di-...@jrc.ec.europa.eu Disclaimer: The views expressed are purely those of the writer and may not in any circumstance be regarded as stating an official position of the European Commission.
_______________________________________________ grass-psc mailing list grass-psc@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc