On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Moritz Lennert <mlenn...@club.worldonline.be> wrote: > On 24/11/14 14:38, Martin Landa wrote: >> >> Dear all, >> >> as we are closer and closer to GRASS 7 release I would like to open >> discussion related to "Release procedure" - RFC4 [1]. Ideally (I would >> say) it would make sense to find a way how accept such procedure >> before we start with GRASS RCs... >> >> Thanks for your feedback in advance! Martin >> >> [1] http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/RFC/4_ReleaseProcedure > > > Rereading it I found parts that didn't seem clear, so I reordered the > sentences slightly to make the meaning clearer.
While this is all nice, I am strongly lacking support in the day to day release management. Again the RC1 feedback is actually 0 (zero). The "General Procedure" in the document is lacking answers to what to do if no or no reasonable feedback occurs. Any ideas? We are in soft freeze for months. Markus _______________________________________________ grass-psc mailing list grass-psc@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc
