Since I'm in there anyway editing a couple of minor grammatical fixes, I've deleted that sentence based on this latest exchange plus the fact that it makes sense to me. But I'm doing so in the comfort of knowing that my edits can be easily reverted, so don't hesitate if there's reason.
> On Jan 6, 2015, at 05:35, Moritz Lennert <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 06/01/15 11:25, Martin Landa wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> 2014-12-30 0:29 GMT+01:00 Markus Neteler <[email protected]>: >> >>>> I agree with Maris that no feedback should be interpreted as agreement. >> >> I would also agree with that. It would be reasonable also to set some >> deadline for discussion and then to propose voting. What do you think? >>> http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/RFC/4_ReleaseProcedure?action=diff&version=7&old_version=6 >> >> I did cosmetics changes [1]. >> >>> I found that a "tbd" is still there. >> >> I would suggest to simply delete this sentence. Creating extra branch >> for such purpose seems to be not necessary to me. Any opinion on that? > > +1 > > Moritz > > _______________________________________________ > grass-psc mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc > <http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc>
_______________________________________________ grass-psc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc
