On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 6:14 PM, Michael Barton <michael.bar...@asu.edu> wrote: > My 2 cents. While that might seem like a good idea for now, given that there > has been no change to the PSC for a number of years, I'm not convinced that > is the best strategy for the long term. For a body like this, it is very > important to have continuity of technical knowledge, but more importantly of > project culture, ethos, and history. That is best achieved by staggered > elections in which some portion (third, half) of the PCS is elected every > couple years. It sounds like we need to replace about 1/3 of the PCS now due > to some of the group moving on. So that would be a convenient number to get.
This is how the OSGeo board renewal works. Since we are currently rather stuck with a lot of inactive members I suggest to proceed and renew asap. Markus _______________________________________________ grass-psc mailing list grass-psc@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc
