> Hamish wrote:
> > v.buffer has some problems,
> > http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/90
> >
> > It's not a perfect solution but maybe try v.to.rast + r.buffer +
> > r.to.vect ?
Nikos:
> In general I try to avoid rasterising of vectors, do something and
> then vectorise back.
it's not a great solution, but it is perhaps better than having output
with incorrect gaps.
> It's off topic but I have a question: what's
> the deal concerning loss off information/ distortion etc. ? On which
> factors it depends most? Resolution?
resolution + rasterization method.
you can minimize resolution issues by making the resolution as fine as
practicable; see the v.to.rast module help page for information on the
different methods depending on feature type.
Hamish
____________________________________________________________________________________
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page.
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
_______________________________________________
grass-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
