On Wed, 2008-03-12 at 19:08 -0700, Hamish wrote: > > Hamish wrote: > > > v.buffer has some problems, > > > http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/90 > > > > > > It's not a perfect solution but maybe try v.to.rast + r.buffer + > > > r.to.vect ? > > Nikos: > > In general I try to avoid rasterising of vectors, do something and > > then vectorise back. > > it's not a great solution, but it is perhaps better than having output > with incorrect gaps. > > > > It's off topic but I have a question: what's > > the deal concerning loss off information/ distortion etc. ? On which > > factors it depends most? Resolution? > > resolution + rasterization method. > > you can minimize resolution issues by making the resolution as fine as > practicable; see the v.to.rast module help page for information on the > different methods depending on feature type. > > > Hamish
Thank you Hamish! _______________________________________________ grass-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
