G. Allegri wrote: > perfect. I was used to build grass, then build gdal with grass, and > then rebuild grass. This time I'll follow your suggestion: > I've just built gdal 1.5.2 (without grass) and grass (--with-gdal) , > and now I will compile gdal-grass plugin 1.4.2. > > Last question (I'm sorry for my ignorance!): why grass configure asks > for --with-gdal? Does this option prepare grass to use the gdal-grass > plugin?
GRASS needs GDAL. The --with-gdal switch allows the path to the gdal-config script to be passed as an argument, in case it isn't in the path, or in case you want to use a version other than the one which comes first in the path. You can't use --without-gdal or --with-gdal=no; GDAL is non-optional. However, GRASS doesn't require that GDAL is built with GRASS support, or the GDAL-GRASS plugin. -- Glynn Clements <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ grass-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
