I was just writing again... answering to my (stupid) question by myself. I was getting lost between GDAL and GRASS! :-) Thanks anyway.
2008/8/14 Glynn Clements <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > G. Allegri wrote: > > > perfect. I was used to build grass, then build gdal with grass, and > > then rebuild grass. This time I'll follow your suggestion: > > I've just built gdal 1.5.2 (without grass) and grass (--with-gdal) , > > and now I will compile gdal-grass plugin 1.4.2. > > > > Last question (I'm sorry for my ignorance!): why grass configure asks > > for --with-gdal? Does this option prepare grass to use the gdal-grass > > plugin? > > GRASS needs GDAL. > > The --with-gdal switch allows the path to the gdal-config script to be > passed as an argument, in case it isn't in the path, or in case you > want to use a version other than the one which comes first in the > path. You can't use --without-gdal or --with-gdal=no; GDAL is > non-optional. > > However, GRASS doesn't require that GDAL is built with GRASS support, > or the GDAL-GRASS plugin. > > -- > Glynn Clements <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >
_______________________________________________ grass-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
