On Jan 20, 2009, at 3:16 PM, Markus Neteler wrote:

Helena,

I guess this is a question for you. If you post from [email protected] it
reaches grass-user directly.

Markus

On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 8:39 PM, Moskovitz, Bob
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hello Grass Users,

I was just wondering why aspect is measured from the east and increased
counterclockwise instead of the north and clockwise?  It seems to run
counter to what is done in other GISs.

at the time when it was implemented there was no other major raster GIS (no Spatial Analyst, only some research software and each used different rule, based on the background of the developer), so it was done to conform how the angles are measured in math (east is your +x
and the values increase counterclockw).
I vaguely remember discussions on whether to change it to conform with
the "aspect as azimuth" concept with 0 pointing towards North but there were already too many people used to the way it was originally implemented that it was safer to keep it. (we had to make the decision for aspect in v.surf.rst as well and we decided
to keep the math convention to make it consistent with r.slope.aspect).

GRASS7 provides opportunity to change it and make sure that all modules that compute and use aspect or flow direction conform to the same rule. But it would be a major undertaking that could break a lot of scripts - I am not sure it is worth it and whether anybody would actually be
willing to do it - it really depends on what your background is.
So if there are people who think this is really important and there is some official standard that says what it should be and there are some volunteers to actually work on it, please post
to the grass-dev list,

Helena

Bob


Bob Moskovitz
Research Analyst I
Seismic Hazard Zonation Project
California Geological Survey
http://www.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/shzp

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This communication is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This message contains information from the State of California, California Geological Survey, which may be privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law, including the Electronic Communications Privacy Act. If the reader of this communication is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this
communication is strictly prohibited.

_______________________________________________
grass-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user





--
Open Source Geospatial Foundation
http://www.osgeo.org/
http://www.grassbook.org/

_______________________________________________
grass-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user

Reply via email to