On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Patton, Eric <[email protected]> wrote: >> Good topic for discussion. I think that GRASS7 should stick with the >> current conventions to retain backwards compatibility. >> Dylan > > But I thought the whole idea of GRASS7 was to introduce new functionality > that is not necessarily intended to be backwards compatible with 6.x series? > The place to make the change, if anywhere, must certainly be in 7 as so much > else is changing in the codebase as well.
I agree. GRASS 7 is there to make radical changes. In this particular case we could add metadata, if not present it is apparently GRASS 6 data stuff, otherwise read what the metadata suggest for the orientation. Markus _______________________________________________ grass-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
