On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 10:24 PM, Vincent Bain <[email protected]> wrote: > Perhaps, > > but it could be interesting to check whether the error is reproductible,
Yes: because in all GRASS 6 versions it is called gem6 (unfortunately). So it must conflict... If the others agree I'll start to add the second version number starting with GRASS 6.5. Then behaviour doesn't change for 6.4. Markus _______________________________________________ grass-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
