On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 10:28 PM, Markus Neteler <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 10:24 PM, Vincent Bain <[email protected]> wrote: >> Perhaps, >> >> but it could be interesting to check whether the error is reproductible, > > Yes: because in all GRASS 6 versions it is called gem6 (unfortunately). > So it must conflict... > If the others agree I'll start to add the second version number starting > with GRASS 6.5. Then behaviour doesn't change for 6.4.
Done in 6.5.svn and 7.svn. Markus _______________________________________________ grass-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
