Hamish:
> > Right now GEM is not getting any _new_ development
> > though, so no new features are planned.
Martin:
> That's new information for me. I was thinking that we
> are going to use g.extension instead of gem
right, but one does not preclude the other.
> and to drop gem at the end (already done in trunk).
nothing new about enforcing backwards compatibility for
previously released features. that isn't an issue for
grass7, which is why it could be removed there.
and apparently the maintenance burden for this one is low,
which is good.
Hamish
_______________________________________________
grass-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
